|
The
iSLP was conceived in apartheid
South Africa at a time when low cost housing
development for Blacks, in particular, had become
paralysed by a lack of acceptance of government
policies, no accredited community leadership,
uncontrollable urbanisation and increasing
violence in overcrowded squatter camps.
Furthermore, in Cape Town a labour preference
policy was applied which discriminated against
Blacks in favour of other race groups. The
settlement of Crossroads had become the violent
centre of the urban conflict, instigated by a
confused amalgam of "warlords"
and agents of the State.
By
1990 the government had realised that influx and
settlement control were impossible to implement -
and that it had fallen so far behind in the
provision of land and basic services that the
safety and health of communities in Cape Town were
threatened. The Provincial Government decided to
explore possibilities, and invited representatives
of political and civic organisations within the
most disadvantaged communities to join it and
representatives of local government in
discussions. Never before had this been attempted
in South Africa.
Only
one process could possibly work - a genuine
sharing of ideas regarding the attainment of a
common goal. The integrity of the process would be
paramount, as trust was in short supply. The
definition of the product would have to take
second place. Thus began the Policy
Phase, which had no time limit but was
completed to the satisfaction of every party
represented in the Policy Committee by September
1993. The Policy Phase culminated in the
definition of the project and adoption of the iSLP
Principles by which the project would
be implemented. It was agreed that the
Provincial
Government should be the responsible
authority, but that an independent iSLP
Coordinator be appointed to ensure
continued synergy and the maintenance of the iSLP
Principles.
Only
then did the Implementation
Phase begin, very slowly at first, as
new sets of protocols, involving as many as 30
separate communities and diverse other
stakeholders, had to be designed, agreed and
tested. This vulnerable stage was seen by some
members of the Policy Committee as an opportunity
to hijack the project, ostensibly on behalf of "the
community".
However, their appeal to the national Minister of
Housing had a dramatic reverse effect - not only
was their claim rejected and the Policy Committee
summarily disbanded, but in December 1994 the
project was proclaimed a Special Integrated
Presidential Project of the new government's
Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP)
and provided with a generous allocation of funding.
As a result there was a huge renewal of commitment
and mobilisation of resources that has sustained
the iSLP through the first eventful years of South
Africa's
transformation. It has been referred to as one of
the most complex large human settlement projects
in the world.
The
fact that it is still delivering, long after its
genesis in late 1990, is due primarily to the
sustained integrity of its
participative processes.
The
Beneficiaries
The
iSLP was conceived primarily in order to address
the housing needs of a specific constituency - the
shack-dwelling population in and around the
long-standing "Black
townships"
of Nyanga, Guguletu and Langa. Most households
resided in informal settlements, but many
were accommodated in shacks located in the
backyards of township houses. It was agreed at an
early stage that those in informal settlements
would be given priority, on account of the
relatively abysmal and unhealthy conditions
pertaining in those areas. Backyard dwellers would
be given priority in the development of any newly
released areas within the townships - such as the "buffer
strips"
created by the urban planners of the old apartheid
regime.
The
target group is from the poorest sector of the
metropolitan population. 97% of beneficiary
households earn less than R1 500 (US$ 214 per
month as at May 2000 rate of exchange). As such they have the
advantage of access to the largest available
housing subsidy - a capital grant of R16 000 (from
1 April 1999) plus 15% premium to compensate for
difficult soil conditions. Among their many
disadvantages is an inability to obtain access to
credit. As a consequence the housing product
delivered by the iSLP has been tailored to the
maximum housing subsidy available.
One
significant component of the iSLP has a different
beneficiary mix. During the
Policy Phase it was decided that the
southernmost 50% of the undeveloped land in
Southern Delft would allocated to the iSLP. The
intention was that the northern sector would be
developed by the erstwhile House of
Representatives as an extension of its housing
programme for the "Coloured"
community. However, with the abolition of racially
segregated institutions and policies in 1994 the
iSLP was given responsibility for developing 100%
of Southern Delft, on condition that the "Coloured"
community would still be able to gain access to
50% of the sites within each phase - i.e.
instead of creating racial ghettos north and south
each phase of the Southern Delft project would be
mixed. With further institutional changes it is
now the case that 50% of beneficiaries are from
the iSLP communities and 50% are nominated by the
Tygerberg local authority, in which Southern Delft
is located. Although the development of Southern
Delft has been subject to threats
to the project in the form of illegal
occupations, the community, which must be one of
the most racially mixed in the metropole, has
coped well. |